The piano is taught more than any other single instrument in America. And children studying piano learn to give recital programs no sooner than they can muster a few tunes.
This week, host Terrance McKnight features music written for piano. However his approach is not to cover the the mammoth works from the genre nor present works chronologically or thematically. This show is about the many moods, colors, shades and styles of piano music and the ways they have evolved over the past 300 years. And for variation, we hear a splash of clarinet and coloratura.
Playlist:
Berceuse in D-flat, Op. 57
Frederic Chopin
Marc-Andre-Hamelin
Hyperion
Troubled Water
Margaret Bonds
Joel Fan
Reference Recordings
Four Piano Blues
Aaron Copland
Alan Marks
Nimbus
“La vega”
Isaac Abeniz
Marc-andre Hamelin
Hyperion
Scherzo diabolico
Charles-Valentin alkan
Laurent Martin
Bernard Ringeissen
Naxos
Suggestion diabolique
Sergei Prokofiev
Andrei Gavrilov
Angel/EMI
The Shepard on the Rock
Franz Schubert
Kathleen Battle, soprano
James Levine, piano
Karl Leister, clarinet
DG
Piano sonata No. 9
Alexander Scriabin
Marcandre Hamelin
Ballade, Op. 46
Samuel Barber
John Browning
Music Masters
The Negro Speaks of Rivers
Margaret Bonds
Darryl Taylor
Naxos
Six Morceaux for piano
Sergei Rachmaninoff
Martha Argerich, piano
Mirabela Dina, piano
Angel/EMI
Metamorphosis
Phillip Glass
DBR, violin
Thirsty Ear


Comments [2]
Continuing in the same extended topic vein (on a now bit-bucket post):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14jPvnWhdNM
NPR's 'Been there. Done that.'
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18666248
Loosely segue related:
Glenn Gould had his famous Steinway CD318 highly modified but he wanted a change that wasn't possible. He wanted to be able to effect vibrato by rocking the keys while pressed.
With our modern world of electro-mechanics, why not have a piano with variable sized keyboards so that people with hands smaller than Rachmaninoff's might more easily be able to play?
Why not have piano vibrato?
Programmed (computer coded virtuosity): This is probably possible already, given the recreations of past performances through analysis of older technology recordings, but why not have people program a piano to play like virtuosi? Sure, people want the show, but as Gould demonstrated, novel interpretations don't have to be seen to be appreciated. Why does someone have to have one in a hundred million physical talent to produce creative interpretations?
Maybe in the future the creation of virtual singing voices will expand the range of vocal interpretations?
I heard somewhere (don't remember where) that Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue, which begins with a clarinet glissando, wasn't written by Gershwin but an original orchestral arranger who knew a clarinet player who had a signature glissando, which was rarely done then. The result was the famous start of the rhapsody.
Checking..
....................
The opening clarinet glissando came into being during rehearsal when; "...as a joke on Gershwin, [Ross] Gorman (Whiteman's virtuoso clarinettist) played the opening measure with a noticeable glissando, adding what he considered a humorous touch to the passage. Reacting favourably to Gorman’s whimsy, Gershwin asked him to perform the opening measure that way at the concert and to add as much of a 'wail' as possible."
....................
Schwartz, Charles, (1979). - Gershwin: His Life and Music. - New York, New York: Da Capo Press. - pp.81-83. - ISBN 978-0-306-80096-2. (via Wikipedia)
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.