Published by
Arts News

"Revisals" Vs. Revivals: Changing Musicals' Original Playbooks

Email a Friend

There's an article in today's Wall Street Journal that gave me pause. It talks about how some producers and directors of musical theatre are tinkering with many musicals' original playbook; adding or subtracting songs, replacing dialogue that might sound out of date--essentially changing something written in or for a specific place and time.

Now this isn't the same as, say, setting Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet in a version of modern day Miami, as director Baz Luhrmann did in his 1996 film. It's more of what the WSJ calls a "revisal"--performers singing numbers that may not have been in the show the first time around.

Clearly, the right to make these changes rests with the composer or the composer's estate--but should it be done just because it can be done? Movies do remakes all the time, so what's the problem? Is a live performance something so special that it needs to hew to the original script and score? Is there room for improvement in even the most beloved shows?