Where are Italy’s Opera Singers? Part III

Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 05:36 PM

Teatro alla Scala in Milan Teatro alla Scala in Milan (Vittorio Zunino Celotto/Getty Images)

As I discussed in the previous two posts, there are very fine Italian singers performing in their home country and abroad. But I fear that the connective thread that is this great tradition is badly, perhaps irreparably, frayed. In discussing this with friends and colleagues, numerous reasons have come forth. I know I will step on certain toes in my analysis, but it must be done.

By some estimates, Italy (estimated population 60.6 million) has 40 percent of the world’s cultural patrimony. This term usually implies works of art, architecture and historic buildings of value. Like it or not, the Republic of Italy finds itself the custodian of much of world heritage. It has had a mixed record in this regard. Thousands of works have perished due to neglect but hundreds of thousands of these treasures are in museums and private collections where they are admirably conserved. Italians are among the world’s finest preservers and restorers of items from the past.

We must remember that the Italian Republic is only 150 years old even though civilization on the peninsula goes back thousands of years. Before that, things of value were looked after by the nobles, the wealthy or the Church. When Italy became a State -- lo Stato -- it took ownership and responsibility for many of these treasures. In 1929, the Lateran Treaties separated the powers of Church and State and, we would infer, responsibilities for maintenance of treasures that belong to one or the other. Believe me, the connection and complicity of religious institutions and the Italian government is as thick and complex as ever. Just like the USA!

Even though Italy had a remarkable economic boom in the era since World War II, it still does not have the funds to maintain all of its treasures. This is why museums charge admission and, to many people’s chagrin, some churches charge you to visit. The Church has vast wealth and a fashion-conscious pope. I do not want to get into a discussion about how the Catholic Church should spend its money or how vows of poverty contrast with dazzling wealth. Suffice it to say that the cost of conserving the art and architecture the Church has fostered is daunting.

Up to now, I have been speaking of tangible things. We can place a value on a sculpture or a castle. This topic is more complicated when it comes something that is, in effect, intangible until it is made real. That is the case with opera. We can hold a score of Norma and sing from it, but it is not an opera until it has been given a production in a theater with singers, instrumentalists, conductor, stage director, scenery, costumes, lighting and an audience.

Somehow, in the post-war era, Italians understood that their culture in all of its variety and brilliance was something to be admired and preserved. The expectation was that the State would see to this. But this has changed in recent years. When Italy became part of the European Union, it benefited economically but saw a diluting of its culture. Younger Italians sought to emulate the lifestyles and youth culture of other nations, turning their backs on the heritage that the rest of Europe and much of the world revered about Italy.

How Italy Abandoned its Culture

Then, in 1994, Silvio Berlusconi became prime minister. He was Italy’s richest man, having made his fortune as a media baron with a very low standard of taste. As head of state, he not only controlled his three TV networks but took the reins of the RAI, the three Italian state TV and radio networks that had a tradition of outstanding programming in addition to some cheesy entertainment. Italians could see operas, concerts, plays, debates, news and classic films. Much of this programming had little or no commercial interruptions. Advertising came in blocks between the programs and Italians looked forward to watching these as a separate program called Carosello.

Berlusconi’s networks sought to imitate foreign, especially American, commercial programming. He had talk shows, so-called “reality television,” with scantily clad women who became more talked-about than women with brains and talent. The status of women has tumbled in Berlusconi’s Italy and there is more focus on cosmetic surgery and looks than professional and intellectual achievement. In the coming days the annual Miss Italy competition will take place over three nights on RAI. The presentation and concept are so demeaning that it makes the Miss America competition (now consigned on one night on cable) seem almost intellectual.

When Berlusconi became head of state, the values and commercialism of his networks infected the three RAI channels. It would be unthinkable in most countries to allow the head of state to control six of the seven television networks. And yet Italians have enabled this hegemony. Berlusconi also owns magazines, newspapers, publishing houses, and advertising agencies and seeks to stifle dissent of all kinds. Facebook in Italy has become one of the few forces of independent speech and Berlusconi has tried to silence that too. 

One of the many groups on Facebook advocates the return of cultural programming to prime time television. The rare opera or concert that is offered runs at two in the morning. Commenters correctly point out that once there was only one channel in Italy, RAI 1, and it presented an opera every Friday evening. Now, with seven public channels and many cable channels, there is almost no opera to be seen apart from a weekly telecast at 2:00 in the morning.

As television has become, in the past two decades, the foremost mirror and framer of values in Italy, there has been a tragic coarsening of the cultural climate. Young Italians, even those with an inclination to drink from the great national cultural well, find little on television to inspire them. A young Italian with a voice has almost no exposure to opera, no place to connect to this marvelous heritage. Some state money for opera (though not as much as Austria, Finland, France or Germany) came from the budget of the Fondo Unico per lo Spettacolo, which covered about a dozen theaters, including Turin, Milan, Venice, Trieste, Bologna, Florence, Genoa, Rome, Naples, Bari, Palermo and Cagliari. Berlusconi and his governments have cut back on these funds for opera houses.

Only a few theaters seem to have full seasons. La Scala, though full of internecine battles, still has an appeal for tourists and can manage to stay afloat in wealthy Milan. And yet it might only have 80 or 90 opera performances a year, compared to about 200 at the Met and even more in Vienna, Munich or Berlin. The Teatro Regio in Turin and the summer festival in Verona also are surviving, almost thriving, and other festivals (such as the Rossini and the Sferisterio in Le Marche) manage because of local support and belief in them. But Bologna, Genoa, Florence and Venice have all cut back. Trieste’s management is being very prudent and seems to spend every Euro sensibly. Naples and Palermo have their ups and downs according to who is managing the theaters and who is the mayor. But they keep their potential for greatness.

So Beautiful and Lost

But the prognosis for most opera companies in Italy is dire. The smaller theaters are dark most of the time, so that any Italian who wants to partake of opera must strategize and save to attend a performance in one of the few cities that still has them. Television and radio offer few models for culture. 

What all of this means is that the next generation of potential Italian opera singers has little exposure to opera. The received impression is that opera is old and out of date while being a showgirl or reality TV figure is the way to success. There is no prevailing belief in the greatness of Italian culture. Students read Ovid, Dante, Petrarch, Leopardi, Manzoni, D’Annunzio, Saba and Pavese under duress and most Italians read very little as adults. Italy has some of the lowest newspaper readership in Europe, despite having excellent print journalism that is mixed in with headlines about scandals.

Italy, I think, is not suited to globalization and its flattening effects but, rather, is the nation that has set the gold standard in so many endeavors because there was a respect for quality and achievement. I wish Italians would come to feel not only proud of their cultural heritage but actively protective of it and expert in it. To name a few achievements: architecture, agriculture, oenology, hand crafts of many types (metalworking, shoemaking, tailoring, sewing, embroidery, scenic design, working with marble) and opera. 

This country has so much it can teach the world but only if it continues to master these skills and not think that someone else -- state or Church -- for example, will take care of it. Italy, home of St. Francis of Assisi, was late to environmentalism because people may have kept their own plots of land beautiful and clean but there was no sense of the needs of the nation.

In the week of the 150th anniversary of the creation of the Italian republic last March, during a performance in Rome of the great patriotic opera Nabucco, Riccardo Muti admonished onorevoli (government officials, many of them self-important) in the audience about funds for culture being cut. This followed the singing of the famous “Va, pensiero” chorus about a country being “si bella e perduta” (so beautiful and lost). An audience member has cried “Viva Italia!” and there is a clamoring for an encore.

Before leading audience and chorus, he speaks extemporaneously, saying “Yes, viva Italia. But here we are at home so let us speak together. ‘Va pensiero,’ in the old days, was a political symbol. I am not a politician but I can say that if our culture continues to be killed, our Italy will be beautiful and lost.” And then he asked the audience to join the chorus to intone these words so dear to Verdi.

Photo credits: Silvio Berlusconi: Filippo Monteforte/AFP

Riccardo Muti: Michael Rayner/AFP/Getty


More in:

Comments [13]

Peter Simeti from manhasset, LI

Sad to say, what you've stated is generally true about Italians (and Italian-Americans) is true.

We go to Italy frequently and always get into arguments with Italians about culture and civic pride. They are proud of their culture, but they are woefully ignorant of what it is, what it represents and what it requires to preserve and perpetuate it. Very few of them are patrons of their cultural patrimony and seem to be indifferent as to what is happening outside their front door!

Sep. 07 2011 11:49 AM
DC Tharpe from Tallahassee FL

Fred Plotkin has movingly described this sad state of affairs, and we all seem to agree that age-old cultures are declining around the globe. That said, what can be done to reverse this lamentable situation? In the U.S., most everyone bellyaches, but voters stay at home on election day and generally do not participate in our "democracy," replacing action with the same kind of apathy that has allowed the rise of right-wing politicians who speak for corporations and the demise of the arts, including insufficient funds for public television broadcasting and the closing of several U.S. opera houses. The United Nations is too busy with peace and security, development, human rights, and international law to help. So how can we find the will to preserve cultural treasures? What form should this effort take, and who will lead the fight? Where do I sign up?

Sep. 06 2011 11:34 AM
Brad from Venezia, Italia

Bravo to Mr. Plotkin for a well-reasoned, spot-on analysis! I live in Italy and can confirm that every word and every punctuation mark of this essay is the honest-to-God truth. Thank you, thank you, thank you for treating this topic with both frankness and affection. Now if only enough people in Italy would read this!

Sep. 03 2011 06:05 PM
James Jagiello from Forest Hills, NY

One thing is that Italian singers focus on mostly, of course, Italian opera. Just like the Russians focus mainly on Tchaikovsky, Moussorgsky, Rimsky-Korsakov and other Russian composers, and the Germans mostly focus on Wagner and R. Strauss.

Sep. 02 2011 04:52 PM
concetta nardone from Elmont, NY

Re-reading Fred's column has made me even sadder. I grew up listening to radio. We would have the Italian station playing some of the time. Great music, the Neopolitans wrote songs that wound up on the concert stage. The great Murollo wrote gorgeous songs, DeCurtis, etc. Then I had New York radio with the NBC Symphony, Met Opera broadcasts and yes, WQXR. The Italian station would also broadcast some singing by the great Jewish cantors during the Jewish holidays, the Kousevettsky (?) brothers I think. I was truly blessed.

Sep. 02 2011 01:12 PM
Christine from New York City

I think it's hard to lament the relative scarcity of top notch Italian opera singers these days without considering also that the Iron Curtain has been down for a few decades and that we're now blessed with many interesting singers from the former USSR, Central and Eastern Europe. The Italian intonation of most of these singers is very good and there are simply more of them, numbers wise, than Italians. They're stiff competition for everyone!

Sep. 01 2011 02:42 PM
Fred Plotkin from New York

To Mr. Christiano, Thank you for your comments. I must respectfully disagree because I think they reflect what Italy might have been 30 to 40 years ago but no longer is. I am afraid that most Italians under 50 have very little real awareness of their cultural heritage. They may theoretically know that Italy has possessed an extraordinary culture and more than one civilization that has given so much to the world. But few of these people can identify what these contributions are and, therefore, have no emotional investment in saving them. If they felt differently, they would not have allowed Berlusconi to be in power most of the time since 1994. I have lived, studied and worked in Italy since 1973. There have certainly been 20 governments in those years and all of them, whether left, right, or center, understood the importance of maintaining Italy's cultural and artistic patrimony. Except for this one. The cultural patrimony has been more actively trashed (as opposed to neglected due to lack of means) only since Berlusconi gained office and control of most of the media. As I mentioned in my article, he imitated or adapted much of the worst of international entertainment and programming (a lot of it from the United States) and, with almost complete control of the media, was able to eliminate much of what did not suit his aesthetic. Imagine if Rupert Murdoch were president of the USA and, in addition to his newspapers, networks and publishing houses, also controlled the content of ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS. That is the situation in Italy. I think Italians innately understood once the value of their culture but, in the past two decades they look in the cultural mirror that is television and they see almost nothing that reminds them of their great culture. It is like having a blackout for 20 years, with almost no light. But thank you, Mr. Christiano, for your comment. I know that you and I want the same thing for Italy.

Sep. 01 2011 01:54 PM
Laurie from Alassio

Thanks for this insightul third portion! As a long time resident in Italy I'd have to agree with Fred that Italians today are sadly lacking in awareness of their cultural heritage. I am afraid the "simple farmer singing Verdi" stereotype is....just that, and does not represent the reality of Italy today.

So true that Italians must no longer expect to be taken care of by church or state. More to the point, they must learn how to be proactive - which will be a hard job in a society that has come to believe that there's no point in taking action.

Sep. 01 2011 11:46 AM
Concetta Nardone from Elmont, NY

Fine article. As for the coarsening of the Italian culture, it is very apparent even here.
Ovation TV channel used to show concerts and operas, at least early afternoon. No longer does this. Bravo TV was also showing great music, dance, opera. Not true anymore. Real Housewives garbage. Now for Italy, I watch Italian News on RAI and they are always throwing in English words when there are perfectly good Italian words. They throw in welfare, leader, killer, etc. The pity is that Italian is a rich, descriptive language. As for Italian TV, it is even worse than ours. And Berlusconi is a pig, so what do you expect? He keeps getting elected. When you have mass culture, you have mass vulgarity. Look forward to your columns.

Sep. 01 2011 11:20 AM
John J. Christiano from Franklin NJ

Mr. Plotkin does a disservice to the Italians. They are keenly aware of their artisitc heritage and guard it jealously. You would be surprised how the simplest peasant farmer knows his opera.

The problem here is that today's media want to see more than just talent. They need to have superstars who not only have the talent, but also the "look".

They want personalities who can be American Idol judges, Dancing With The Stars, have some seemy background that can feed the tabloids or cheat on their wives or have multiple love interests.

Any artist who lives purely for his art will never grow or survive in that environment and I'm sure they avoid it for those reasons.

Don't judge Italy's path by its governement. It never had a stable government. Look to her people. They are the heart and soul of Italy.

Sep. 01 2011 08:34 AM
meche from MIMA

I feel enriched and provoked by this information Fred. I am thinking of the words of Il Principe di Salinas in "Il Gattopardo". The era of lions and leopards was drawing to a close and the era of jackals and hyenas was coming. How prescient. Unification had a price and becoming part of the EU also has a price.

Sep. 01 2011 12:34 AM

An eloquent, but sad comment, Fred, that could well describe the state of all arts.

But to look forward with some optimism, to a keeper of the cultural flame, I do know that Marcello Giordani has established a foundation (www.marcellogiordani-foundation.org/) in collaboration with Teatro Massimo V. Bellini in Catania, in his home of Sicily. Briefly, from their mission statement, the Foundation is committed to the promotion of opera, particularly Italian opera, and the creation of artists to serve as ambassadors of Italian opera, language and culture, at home and throughout the world. It sponsors advanced master classes, scholarships, financial aid and career training, etc., in its commitment to the future of opera. It is so important to hear voices for change but maybe it will take more personal responsibility and ACTION from individuals such as Marcello's. His is a gift of not only his beautiful voice but this generous legacy for the future.

Aug. 31 2011 09:03 PM
Fiorella Sampirisi from Wash. DC metro area

I'm italian, I work for an italian tenor and am familiar with the "world of opera". Yours is a very thoughtful and objective view of the situation of the the arts in Italy today. Bravo Muti and thank you Fred! We need more people speaking up against this "vergogna".

Aug. 31 2011 07:04 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.


About Operavore

Operavore is WQXR's digital 24/7 audio stream and devoted to Opera. The Operavore blog features breaking news, expert commentary and reviews by writers Fred Plotkin, David Patrick Stearns and others. The music stream features a continuous, carefully programmed mix of classic and contemporary opera recordings.

Follow Operavore